Alexander Slavros of IronMarch (who himself is apparently not even White and has a sketchy past – see links here & here) has come out with a PDF booklet that takes a close look at the cesspool collectively referred to as the “Alt Right,” and Some of it is kind of funny in parts, and a lot of his observations of the alt right people are accurate. They are too much into half-measures, and not the things that actually work. As a collective, they waste enormous amounts of energy on electoral politics and hardly any on legal direct action (or non-voting “practical politics.”)
In the chapter titled, “Where We Stand”, he writes the following of our “allies” –
“They think that by compromising they are being clever (as clever as saying that 2+2 is 5), and are annoyed when we attack them for it. They toss nonsense like the “Overton window” at us, saying that at least by promoting 2+2 as 5 they are moving the 2+2 is 6 liars closer to the truth of 2+2 equaling 4, when in reality all they have achieved was obscure the Truth with another lie. 5 is not a “better”answer than 6 , because they are equally wrong. In the end it is them alone who made an “Overton window shift” closer to the liars and further away from the Truth, not the other way around.”
He’s basically talking about those instances where the Trumptards would try to justify their undue support for their preferred jew puppet by saying things like, “yeah, we know Trump isn’t everything that we memed him up to be, but we’re exploiting him to bring more people to the truth!” Or my favorite cliché of theirs, “civic nationalism isn’t a White ethnostate, but give it time! They’ll come around eventually!” Fools! Civic nationalism only lulls the lemmings into an even deeper sleep with the false sense of security it provides.
Later in the same chapter, he expands further:
“Imagine if this sort of reasoning was applied in hard sciences, imagine if this mentality was in charge of constructing the building you are living in – how soon before that building would collapse on your head? In fact, would said building ever reach completion in the first place? Would you trust such “builders”?”
Indeed, building revolutionary movements is like building a house. Too many structural deformities, and the whole thing collapses! This is why “purity spiraling” is an absolute necessity to keep any organization from rotting from within.
His critique of these self-styled “White Nationalists” leading the Alt Right is 100% spot on. In later chapters, he speculates on the possible motives of these individuals. Possible theories include entryism tactics (an age-old failed paleoconservative tradition,) the plausibility of their being White libtards who just got tired of multiracialism and want a White hippy paradise, and how many of them are just hipster neocons with too much time on their hands.
There is also some social commentary in there about what the author considers an ideal society that I would have some problems with; mostly his embracing of the top-down, anthill-like authoritarian aspect; though from looking at his background, it’s hard to say exactly how much he really believes in anything that he says. It looks like Andrew Anglin has a counterpart from the evil twin universe in this guy (no offense intended.) I don’t know his whole story though – that is to say that I only know what is written about him.
Judging from his words, Slavros seems to think that a top-down fascist government would be uncorruptible and that the oversight of the state into everyone’s personal life would necessarily be a good thing for the citizens. In contrast with this view, I believe that ALL governments become corrupt after a certain point, and that eventually our descendants would find themselves in a similar situation to the one we find ourselves in today. If other pro-Whites want an authoritarian government that puts all of the power into the hands of an elite few, then they can have their own OUTSIDE of the jurisdiction of my own neck of the woods. I’ve already had my fill of totalitarianism living under ZOG.
News and Political Commentary
Zero Tolerance – A Critique of the Alt Right
Read Next →
News and Political Commentary
One Year’s Warning.
News and Political Commentary
Now We Are Engaged in a Great Civil War?
News and Political Commentary
When Voting Still Matters.
A reaction from: Cantankerous Ordo
(Heard HERE on The Roper Report)
Alexander Slavros of IronMarch (who himself is apparently not even White and has a sketchy past – see links here & here) has come out with a PDF booklet that takes a close look at the cesspool collectively referred to as the “Alt Right,” and Some of it is kind of funny in parts, and a lot of his observations of the alt right people are accurate. They are too much into half-measures, and not the things that actually work. As a collective, they waste enormous amounts of energy on electoral politics and hardly any on legal direct action (or non-voting “practical politics.”)
In the chapter titled, “Where We Stand”, he writes the following of our “allies” –
“They think that by compromising they are being clever (as clever as saying that 2+2 is 5), and are annoyed when we attack them for it. They toss nonsense like the “Overton window” at us, saying that at least by promoting 2+2 as 5 they are moving the 2+2 is 6 liars closer to the truth of 2+2 equaling 4, when in reality all they have achieved was obscure the Truth with another lie. 5 is not a “better”answer than 6 , because they are equally wrong. In the end it is them alone who made an “Overton window shift” closer to the liars and further away from the Truth, not the other way around.”
He’s basically talking about those instances where the Trumptards would try to justify their undue support for their preferred jew puppet by saying things like, “yeah, we know Trump isn’t everything that we memed him up to be, but we’re exploiting him to bring more people to the truth!” Or my favorite cliché of theirs, “civic nationalism isn’t a White ethnostate, but give it time! They’ll come around eventually!” Fools! Civic nationalism only lulls the lemmings into an even deeper sleep with the false sense of security it provides.
Later in the same chapter, he expands further:
“Imagine if this sort of reasoning was applied in hard sciences, imagine if this mentality was in charge of constructing the building you are living in – how soon before that building would collapse on your head? In fact, would said building ever reach completion in the first place? Would you trust such “builders”?”
Indeed, building revolutionary movements is like building a house. Too many structural deformities, and the whole thing collapses! This is why “purity spiraling” is an absolute necessity to keep any organization from rotting from within.
His critique of these self-styled “White Nationalists” leading the Alt Right is 100% spot on. In later chapters, he speculates on the possible motives of these individuals. Possible theories include entryism tactics (an age-old failed paleoconservative tradition,) the plausibility of their being White libtards who just got tired of multiracialism and want a White hippy paradise, and how many of them are just hipster neocons with too much time on their hands.
There is also some social commentary in there about what the author considers an ideal society that I would have some problems with; mostly his embracing of the top-down, anthill-like authoritarian aspect; though from looking at his background, it’s hard to say exactly how much he really believes in anything that he says. It looks like Andrew Anglin has a counterpart from the evil twin universe in this guy (no offense intended.) I don’t know his whole story though – that is to say that I only know what is written about him.
Judging from his words, Slavros seems to think that a top-down fascist government would be uncorruptible and that the oversight of the state into everyone’s personal life would necessarily be a good thing for the citizens. In contrast with this view, I believe that ALL governments become corrupt after a certain point, and that eventually our descendants would find themselves in a similar situation to the one we find ourselves in today. If other pro-Whites want an authoritarian government that puts all of the power into the hands of an elite few, then they can have their own OUTSIDE of the jurisdiction of my own neck of the woods. I’ve already had my fill of totalitarianism living under ZOG.
Admin
Read Next →
News and Political Commentary
One Year’s Warning.
News and Political Commentary
Now We Are Engaged in a Great Civil War?
News and Political Commentary
When Voting Still Matters.