by Paul Jones
Aside from having given U.S. citizenship to all persons living on the island of Puerto Rico in 1917 in order to allow them to fight for the U.S. in W.W. II, and in particular to defend the Panama Canal due to their supposed immunity to tropical diseases, another case of an event in U.S. History which was highly detrimental to the white man was the Supreme Court case decided in 1898 in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, which gave a wrong interpretation to the Fourteenth Amendment and thus effectively created birthright citizenship.
The 14th Amendment itself states the following: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”
If the legal theory of Original Intent is used to look at the circumstances of this Reconstruction Amendment, it’s clear that the sole rationale was to ensure that U.S. citizenship would never be taken away from the blacks freed from slavery in the South due to the Civil War. As a moderate organization called The People’s Vote states, “The major provision of the 14th Amendment was to grant citizenship to ‘all persons born or naturalized in the United States,’ thereby granting citizenship to former slaves.”
But since the wording itself wasn’t clear as to its intent, and it only stated that any person born on U.S. soil automatically becomes a citizen, Wong Kim Ark, a legal resident of the U.S. born of a mother and father of Chinese descent, brought suit claiming that he was thereby a U.S. citizen because of the wording of the 14thAmendment. In the case appealed by the United States from the District Court for the Northern District of California, the Supreme Court in its decision of July 9, 1898, had to go back to English Common Law and cite a 1608 English case in order to support its reasoning that would give Wong Kim Ark U.S. citizenship by virtue of his birth here.
As the decades have gone by since that erroneous Supreme Court decision, there have been many more individuals taking advantage of this loophole created by the judiciary. Aside from illegal alien women from Third World countries crossing the border into the U.S. in order to give birth and have their anchor babies, we also have upper-middle class women who are five or six months pregnant taking special flights into this country from China, Turkey and where-have-you to stay a few months at special locations, give birth, and then fly back to their home countries with their new U.S. citizens in arms.
Whereas the Supreme Court decision of Plessy v. Ferguson, decided in 1896, which approved legal segregation in the South, was fought against “tooth and nail” for decades by slick Jewish lawyers working to overturn it until finally in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 it was determined that “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal,” little if any legal action has taken place to try and overturn the case of Wong Kim Ark.
However, in a Sept. 16, 2015 presidential debate, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky said “The case that was decided around 1900 was-people had a green card, were here legally, and they said that their children were citizens. There’s never been a direct Supreme Court case on people who were here illegally, whether or not their kids are citizens, so it hasn’t been completely adjudicated.”
It’s clear that if a fraction of the effort put in by the Jewish lobby to overturn Plessy v. Ferguson were made to try and overturn the incorrect decision of United States v. Wong Kim Ark that we could rapidly put an end to birthright citizenship and anchor babies.
Bob White
Its happening in America and its sad. People who ignore the fact that the white race is dying are racist. Its like a tiger watching the news and finding out the species is going extinct and saying “oh well its not my problem”
In 100 years, sub-Saharan Africa will still be full of black people. China will still be full of Chinese people. Indian people will still look the same as they do now.
This problem will only be addressed, wen we force the mainstream media and mainstream politicians to call this for what it is, ethnic cleansing and genocide.
This is perhaps the most important task facing us, calling “immigration” and “multiculturalism” what they REALLY are, the processes by which white genocide is carried out.