by Paul Jones
I have to admit that I
have been reluctant to give up on the Republican Party, especially after the
Trump victory in 2016. But two recent experiences have disillusioned me almost
completely-even though I still am in favor of Trump’s reelection in 2020.
First, I listened to a
video of the closing speech of Attorney Sam Dickson at the American Renaissance
conference in 2018. In it, he basically said he has given up on the political
process as far as any meaningful changes, especially after what happened
following Charlottesville. Dickson was there, and he was shocked as a lawyer
when every single member of the Senate and House of Representatives voted on
Sept. 14, 2017 in favor of a resolution stating that the
car incident involving James Fields was an act of domestic terrorism. This was
before the trial and any evidence, and as Dickson pointed out, with about 40%
of elected officials being lawyers, how could they have voted for a resolution
knowing that it went against basic principles of legal ethics, that is
condemning an accused man before a trial ever having taken place?
Second, the recent
stripping of Rep. King of his committee assignments on the Judiciary and
Agriculture Commissions by the Republican Party due to supposed racist comments
and opinions brought out by a biased and journalistically unfair article in
“The New York Times” really shocked me-though in retrospect it probably
shouldn’t have. It was sickening to see the cuck of all cucks, Mitt Romney,
saying that King should resign as a Representative. This may not be the end of
it, however, since the Democrats in the House of Representative are planning on
bringing a further resolution of condemnation, and if this results it’s likely
that most Republicans will support it.
In the past I have
called the U.S. political system at this point “quasi-totalitarian.” But after
further reflection on the resolution condemning Fields as a domestic terrorist before
a trial, and the recent actions against Rep. King, I think I should look on
this government as full-blown totalitarian.
Think of the Parliament
in days of the Soviet Union in that single party system. Let’s imagine that a
member would have been so bold as to question and criticize Communism. How long
would it be before such an individual would be condemned and expelled from the
body, and in the darkest hours of that regime would likely have joined the
likes of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn in the Gulag Archipelago?
Now consider the U.S.
Congress, where Cultural Marxism is now the required ideology to believe in,
even though for Republicans it’s more of the “light” version. A lone “David,”
Rep. King, tried to go against the “Goliaths” of political correctness by making
some positive comments about Western Civilization and how this could not have been
brought about if it hadn’t been for the European races and so he was pilloried
by all members of both political parties.
If there was any doubt
about how Z.O.G. controls both parties completely, such doubts have now been
put to rest. What a bunch of cowards and reprehensible fools there are among
the lot of them! It’s now clear that without the possibility of a third
political party being able to reflect white racial interests-and given the way
the system works such an option is next to impossible-that we’re still dealing
with “Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dumb,” with the ideology of Cultural Marxism
holding full sway in the United States under our government, similar to the way
in which that of Communism held absolute power in the Parliament during the
times of the Soviet Union.
Please follow and like us:
3987
News and Political Commentary
Communism in Soviet Parliament, Cultural Marxism in U.S. Congress
Read Next →
News and Political Commentary
One Year’s Warning.
News and Political Commentary
Now We Are Engaged in a Great Civil War?
News and Political Commentary
When Voting Still Matters.
by Paul Jones
I have to admit that I have been reluctant to give up on the Republican Party, especially after the Trump victory in 2016. But two recent experiences have disillusioned me almost completely-even though I still am in favor of Trump’s reelection in 2020.
First, I listened to a video of the closing speech of Attorney Sam Dickson at the American Renaissance conference in 2018. In it, he basically said he has given up on the political process as far as any meaningful changes, especially after what happened following Charlottesville. Dickson was there, and he was shocked as a lawyer when every single member of the Senate and House of Representatives voted on Sept. 14, 2017 in favor of a resolution stating that the car incident involving James Fields was an act of domestic terrorism. This was before the trial and any evidence, and as Dickson pointed out, with about 40% of elected officials being lawyers, how could they have voted for a resolution knowing that it went against basic principles of legal ethics, that is condemning an accused man before a trial ever having taken place?
Second, the recent stripping of Rep. King of his committee assignments on the Judiciary and Agriculture Commissions by the Republican Party due to supposed racist comments and opinions brought out by a biased and journalistically unfair article in “The New York Times” really shocked me-though in retrospect it probably shouldn’t have. It was sickening to see the cuck of all cucks, Mitt Romney, saying that King should resign as a Representative. This may not be the end of it, however, since the Democrats in the House of Representative are planning on bringing a further resolution of condemnation, and if this results it’s likely that most Republicans will support it.
In the past I have called the U.S. political system at this point “quasi-totalitarian.” But after further reflection on the resolution condemning Fields as a domestic terrorist before a trial, and the recent actions against Rep. King, I think I should look on this government as full-blown totalitarian.
Think of the Parliament in days of the Soviet Union in that single party system. Let’s imagine that a member would have been so bold as to question and criticize Communism. How long would it be before such an individual would be condemned and expelled from the body, and in the darkest hours of that regime would likely have joined the likes of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn in the Gulag Archipelago?
Now consider the U.S. Congress, where Cultural Marxism is now the required ideology to believe in, even though for Republicans it’s more of the “light” version. A lone “David,” Rep. King, tried to go against the “Goliaths” of political correctness by making some positive comments about Western Civilization and how this could not have been brought about if it hadn’t been for the European races and so he was pilloried by all members of both political parties.
If there was any doubt about how Z.O.G. controls both parties completely, such doubts have now been put to rest. What a bunch of cowards and reprehensible fools there are among the lot of them! It’s now clear that without the possibility of a third political party being able to reflect white racial interests-and given the way the system works such an option is next to impossible-that we’re still dealing with “Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dumb,” with the ideology of Cultural Marxism holding full sway in the United States under our government, similar to the way in which that of Communism held absolute power in the Parliament during the times of the Soviet Union.
Admin
Read Next →
News and Political Commentary
One Year’s Warning.
News and Political Commentary
Now We Are Engaged in a Great Civil War?
News and Political Commentary
When Voting Still Matters.