The ‘Radical Flank Effect’ for Dummies
by Billy Roper
ShieldWall Network Coordinator
Those to our left disavow us. There is noone to our right. Through the Radical Flank Effect The ShieldWall Network creates wiggle room for more ‘moderate’ people to repeat many of our ideas in a slightly more liberal manner which seems more palatable than ours by comparison. Let those to our left whine about our optics and the extremism of our tactics. They need us, and those of them who are intellectually honest, know it. In fact, those who kvetch and cry the most about us scaring people away or turning them off to the cause are the ones best positioned to benefit from our actions, if they would focus on doing their jobs effectively. We accept our role. They should accept theirs. We can and should be symbiotic and complementary. In fact, we don’t even mind their whining. That’s part of it. They can soft-serve their message and try to show everyone how nice and sweet and inoffensive and loving they are…compared to us. Meanwhile, we’ll let them say “that Phineas guy over there went too far, but yes, the foreign wives should go” or “I’m not down with slaying any of them old enough to pisseth against the wall, but segregation is needed”, or “we’re not about chasing people with a whip and turning over their tables, but they shouldn’t be changing money in the temple”…
Although being the furthest right and the hardest comes completely natural to those of us on the Balk Right, we don’t do it accidentally or without careful calculation, either. It’s conscious and purposeful, and designed to provoke a bleating reaction from people in the movement to our left as much as from those outside the movement. It’s supposed to, that’s the idea. Of course, it is sometimes disappointing when those whom we thought might have the testicular fortitude to be at the tip of the spear with us turn out to be too soft and fall back into that secondary anti-radical role, but that’s their part to play in the unfolding historical drama, and we don’t begrudge them their relative weakness or opportunism over idealism. It’s who they are.
Tarrant boiled down the Radical Flank Effect and ‘backfire’ in his Manifesto stating that his actions were designed to produce a reaction from ZOG to provoke a conflict, i.e., accelerationism, to promote the balkanization of the United States. In this rare instance, an action took place to our right, making OUR position seem more mainstream by comparison, as we are a completely legal affiliation and currently disavow violent acts of terrorism. Ain’t that cool? See how that works? So, just about everyone to our right has already martyred themselves. That, we believe, is the line separating positive and negative outcomes for the Radical Flank Effect at this point in the pre-balkanization process.
We are not relying on a democratic vote or mass approval or widespread civil disobedience to fix clown world, so we are not trying to avoid alienating some ephemeral majority of sheeple. We mean to inspire the hardest and toughest to join us and give an excuse to the rest to position themselves to our left, meanwhile triggering the far left to become more radical (Operation Newton’s Cradle). Tarrant had a point, in terms of White Power Jujitsu. Erode the center, radicalize the fringes, minimalize the moderate establishment trying to hold things together on rapidly eroding common ground, and step on the gas.
To paraphrase Michael J. Fox’s Marty McFly character from ‘Back To The Future’, “I know you guys may not be ready for this yet, but your kids are gonna love it”.
Obviously, the focus is on promoting positive, rather than negative, RFE. We do that at this time by keeping our Radical Flank Effect non-violent pre-Balk and also not pushing for mass mobilization, but rather also for accelerationism. We actually promote polarization rather than appealing for majority support.
Dr. Schrock’s conclusions below disregard case studies such as the success of the African National Congress having both political and armed wings, or of course the Irish Republican Army and Sinn Fein, which often disavowed the IRA but benefited from them at the negotiating table, to be sure. But most importantly, further investigation reveals that movements which are not divided by ‘legal’ and ‘illegal’ barriers, but instead in terms of the extremity and radicalness of rhetoric and optics, tend towards a more positive outcome, statistically, of the the RFE, as the rightmost in our case causes its alternative to be seen as the lesser of two evils, as it were.
Those who foolishly always call for unity not only are ignorant of history, i.e. the Mensheviks vs. the Bolsheviks or the Braunshirts vs. the SS, the NSDAP vs. Strasser, et cetera, but should also realize that someone will always be to their right. It might as well be us, since we are consciously aware of what we are doing. In other words, sit in the backseat and bitch about how The Balk Right drives if you want to, but just let us take the wheel, and we’ll get you there.
Dr. Kurt Schrock webinar on the Radical Flank Effect
1 Pingback