Reparations…with Repatriation?

Commentary by Billy Roper

Coordinator, The ShieldWall Network

There are those who philosophically counter-signal the Balk Right by claiming that a peaceful separation of the races in North America is still possible. They advocate for voluntary repatriation of nonWhites, using both positive and negative economic and political incentives.

Among those most vocally supporting reparations tied with repatriation are prominent Black Nationalists who, rather than seeking a ‘New Afrika’ black ethnostate in the southeastern United States, prefer that the descendants of enslaved Africans return to their mother continent.

The challenges to the idea of peaceful separation are manifold. One, the Jewish establishment has weaponized blacks against Whites and have traditionally promoted their interests (founding the NAACP, et al) as a part of their group adaptive survival strategy of undermining White homogeneity. They have no interest in America becoming 15% Whiter, quite the contrary. Secondly, while we in the SWN would agree that slavery was worse than a sin, worse than an injustice, it was an error of great magnitude racially, and we certainly wish that our ancestors had picked their own cotton, and that African slavery had never happened, and we further posit that blacks in America today would all have been much better off had we left their ancestors in Africa to be eaten, most Whites do not possess such a liberal attitude. Many would condescendingly say that blacks NEED paternalistic White governance and guidance in order to keep from making another Liberia. Or, pick any other African country, whether founded by former slaves with the benefit of having been domesticated, or not. Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, multi-generational cycles of dependency have removed all desire for self-sufficiency and independence, especially if they require separation from Whites and even moreso separation by an ocean, from most American blacks. Like a clingy ex, even once we get a divorce and pay them off, many blacks are going to wrap themselves around our legs and beg to stay, unconscious and entitled parasites that they have become. Those are the reasons why we don’t think voluntary and peaceful separation will ever happen. Those caveats having been offered, however, here is a thoughtful article by Brett Stevens from Amerika.org presenting the case a prominent Black Nationalist leader makes for combining reparations with repatriation. We also endorse Mr. Stevens’ call for neo-feudalism in the future White ethnostate, as described here.

Osiris Akkebala Makes The Case For Reparations-With-Repatriation

by Brett Stevens on June 28, 2019

Noted Black Nationalist Osiris Akkebala has spoken clearly about reparations-with-repatriation in the past, making the point that diversity cannot work because each group needs ethnic self-determination, and therefore that diversity must be ended in an equitable way.

Here at Amerika, we agree, in that any ethnic group other than the dominant group — in America, Western Europeans — will be subject to a “conquer or be conquered” requirement by the nature of diversity itself.

Back in the day, we would have opposed slavery, not because of its cruelty, because in most cases it was not cruel, but because it requires us to assert dominion over another tribe and thus become responsible for them, which is the worst of the white “pet” mentality toward other tribes.

Instead, we suggest separation entirely, and that to manage our own under-120 IQ point people, that we adopt the medieval system of manorial feudalism, where local lords owned the land and rented it to serfs, who produced agricultural goods, and kept anything above their rent.

Chattel slavery arose as a replacement for this system after proto-Leftists abolished in it Europe. This, as always, projected white problems onto other tribes, creating the system of diversity which ensures that everyone loses out.

You can hear Osiris here:

Please follow and like us:

3987