The Ongoing Dialectic

” by Paul Jones

I’ve always found interesting the Hegelian dialectic as a way of attempting to explain political events and trends. I believe this can also be seen in conjunction with what I call the Pendular theory of politics.

The dialectic has as its basis the idea of thesis, antithesis and synthesis and the Pendular theory involves seeing any particular historical moment as having a pendulum swinging with more force from Right to Left or vice versa. If the swings become too extreme, then what I call the “Danger Zone” of politics is entered into.

As far as the United States, there have been mostly decades since the end of W.W. II when “politics is played within the 40 yard lines.” That is to say, it’s within a moderate phase when battles are fought with words and compromise is usually possible. No one can actually “win,” just as is the case in American football when unless a team gets beyond the 40 yard line a field goal is not possible and it is necessary to punt if the downs are used up.

However, during the Sixties the political pendulum began to swing more widely with all that was going on with the Anti-war movement, extremist Leftist organizations like the Weathermen or Black Panthers along with the Hippie Movement with its drug culture that softened up youth to buy into radical political solutions. As many have observed, 1968 was the year it all seemed to be falling apart, as chaos in big cities and on college campuses reached a peak.

How did the Hegelian dialectic play into this? At the end of W.W. II, the situation had as a thesis the prevailing WASP power structure, and the antithesis was the increasingly powerful Jewish power structure. Up to this point in U.S. History, the synthesis was the idea that Jewish groups would accept integration into this WASP power structure. In fact, the thinking behind the struggle against National Socialism in Germany was that it had made a mistake in singling out the Jews as an enemy of society and that Jews had just been made a scapegoat. On the other hand in the U.S., since the times of Theodore Roosevelt, the U.S had been able to start to fully integrate Jewish immigrants as “100% Americans” in ways that had not been possible in  Europe with its history of anti-Semitism.

But with the defeat of N.S. Germany a political struggle began by the Jews to replace the previously relatively powerful WASP structure at the top levels of power in the U.S., and this takeover was in its final stage of completion in the Sixties, which explains why during those years matters became so turbulent and politics was not played “within the 40 yard line” and so the swings of the pendulum became wilder as the “danger zone” was entered into.

By the Seventies it was clear that the new reality was that the prevailing thesis in the political dialectic was that Jewish groups were now “riding high in the saddle” and in control. The former WASP groups, along with whites who were Catholics as well, started to create a sort of synthesis with the Jews. Probably the prototype of this was Bill Clinton, whose political career was tied into carefully working with powerful Jews as he became acculturated into prevailing Jewish mores and behavior patterns. His journey was duplicated by myriad other white youth who entered elite universities and rubbed shoulders with Jewish students and were taught by their professors what behavior and style was needed to become a success in the new America.

However, as the racial shifts in the U.S. began to spiral out of control over the next several decades following the Immigration Act of 1965, a new dialectic began to appear: The thesis is Jewish control of the U.S. with non-white minorities but whites playing “second fiddle” to the non-whites, as demonstrated by Joe Biden. The synthesis is for the steadily diminishing number of whites to marry non-whites in growing numbers so that a mulatto and mestizo lower and lower-middle class eventually emerges, as is the case in all the Latin American countries. However, there is an increasingly significant antithesis, which is made up of whites who realize that this synthesis involving their disappearance as a distinct racial group through intermarriage and racial decline is not something they want.

But since most of the whites who have become successful in U.S. society and have entered the upper-middle and upper classes have too great a vested interest in the status quo and have been acculturated into the prevailing Jewish cultural ethic, a la Bill Clinton or Joe Biden, it remains mostly to the lower and lower-middle class whites to determine whether they are willing or not to mount a counter-revolution to try and overturn the Jewish power structure which had its own successful counter-revolution against the WASP power structure in the decades following W.W. II.

This growing tension owing to the new dialectic emerging is causing wilder and wilder swings of the pendulum in recent years, with Trump’s victory in 2016 a sign that it had become fully operational. In the remaining weeks and months leading up to the presidential election of 2020 we will certainly see more “danger zone” type of events since the political rhetoric is getting  more extreme, as seen with most Democratic candidates calling Trump a “White Supremacist,” and Antifa and other extreme Leftist groups becoming more active in attacking not only Right Wing groups, but moderate and conservative Republicans as well.

For me, this is the overall big picture we need to keep in mind so as not to see upcoming events and circumstances as haphazard but growing out of this present dialectic and the consequential pendular swings into the “danger zone,” with all heading towards a “1968” type social and political scenario when it all starts completely falling apart.

Please follow and like us:

3987